Christine Rothschild
The fall of 1967 was an exciting time for 18- year -old
Christine Rothschild. Christine or “Chris” as she was known to her friends, had
recently graduated from Senn High School in Chicago, Illinois a few months
prior and was starting her freshmen year at the University of Wisconsin,
Madison. Christine took up residence at Ann Emery Hall, room 119 on the
university campus.
On the cool damp morning of May 26, 1968 Christine
Rothschild was up at 4 a.m. The night hostess, Mrs. Gertrude Armstrong said “She
came out of her room, headed for the bathroom. I met her in the hall-we almost
ran into each other. That was the last time I saw her.” Seeing Christine out and about in the early morning hours was nothing out of the ordinary. She enjoyed taking morning walks around campus around 7 to 7:30 each morning.
On that last morning, Christine put on a mini-dress, black
boots and an all-weather coat and set out for her walk. What happened after she
left her dorm is something only Christine and her killer know.
Around 7:30 p.m. that same day, 22 year old University
Maintenance worker Phillip Van-Valkenberg tried to enter Sterling Hall. Finding
the doors locked, he went to knock on a lower window behind some bushes in
front of Sterling Hall. In those bushes
Van-Valkenberg came upon the horrific sight that sent shock waves throughout
the entire university.
Christine Rothschild’s lifeless body had been found. It was
a sight UW-Madison Police Chief Ralph Hanson would never forget. “I don’t know
what kind of person would have done this,” he said.
According to Hanson Christine had been stabbed 14 times in
the chest and neck. She also had four broken ribs and a broken jaw, along with
being strangled with the lining of her own coat. Police said the coat lining
was tied into a “slip knot” around her neck and Christine’s gloves were shoved
down her throat. Chief Hanson would not say if Christine was killed where her
body was found, but said there was “plenty of blood” at the scene. There was no sign of sexual assault. Christine was still fully clothed in her mini-dress, black boots and a three-quarter length beige all-weather coat. However, her clothing was “ripped and askew” in some places, but otherwise intact.
The police also reported Christine was still wearing her
rings that appeared “expensive” and a bloody “man’s handkerchief” was found
under her head. There was also a broken umbrella sticking out of the ground
found next to the body.
While no murder weapon was found, the broken umbrella and
handkerchief were sent to the FBI for forensic testing. However, the tests
conducted could not link anyone to the murder. DNA evidence was not available
at this time. The two key pieces of evidence were sent back to UW-Madison Police
Department and from there sent to the county sheriff’s office for safe keeping.
The evidence was ultimately lost so no
modern day analysis can be done.
Since the murder of Christine Rothschild is still an open
case, what remaining evidence there is, is not known. At the time of the murder,
there was speculation by the local press that there could have been foot prints
left at the scene since it rained recently. However, this is not confirmed by
police.
The attack on Christine seemed a bit of an overkill one
could say. The intensity of the violence seemed personal in nature, leading
some to believe Christine may have known her killer. She was described by those
that knew her as a happy and easy going person. So just who exactly could have
done this?
Chief Hanson had no leads to go on, but his department
interviewed several people right away. Nothing would come of it and the State
Crime Lab, who searched the crime scene, refused to disclose if any leads had
been found.
As the summer of 1968 continued, investigators looked into
several “persons of interest” but none proved to be the killer. There was even
a $5,000 reward offered to anyone with information, but that also lead nowhere.
With no new leads, no new suspects and no murder weapon, Christine’s murder was
placed into the “cold case” file.Jumping ahead to 2009, the hunt for Christine Rothschild’s killer is still active. On Saturday, August 29, 2009 NBC News 15, a local news station in Madison, Wisconsin broke the news that police have a person of interest in the murder.
Forty-one years after she was murdered, could it be Christine’s killer was finally found? Many, including Christine’s close friend Linda Schulko says “no.” The news story claimed serial killer William Floyd Zamastil is a “person of interest” in the Rothschild killing. Zamastil is currently serving a life sentence for the 1978 murder and rape of a Madison woman. He has also been indicted for the 1973 murder and rape of a woman from Arizona. Zamastil was sixteen years old when Rothschild was killed and was said to be living in Madison at the time.
“I’m really skeptical that Zamastil murdered Chris,” said
Linda Schulko to NBC News. It was Schulko that has been the driving force in
keeping her dear friend’s murder a live. “If Zamastil had murdered her, this
would possibly be his first crime of this nature.”
One major problem police have not explained is how different
Zamastil’s other victims died compared to Rothschild. Zamastil raped and shot
his victims, then took their bodies far from the crime scene. Christine was
strangled and stabbed, not shot. She also was not raped like the others. It is
also safe to assume she was killed where she was found based on the amount of
blood discovered in the bushes. According to Schulko she thinks, “This is a cop
out for a serial killer to take the rap on something, that it won’t make a
difference since he’s already serving a life sentence.”
As the years have passed, the trail continues growing
colder. Police checked several leads early, but admitted they had no motive and
no weapon to link to the crime.
There was however, one suspect that stood out from the
others. He was a resident surgeon at the University of Wisconsin Hospital at
the time of Christine’s murder. The hospital was located across the street from
Sterling Hall and it was common, according to Schulko, for Christine to stop
for a break and have a cigarette with this surgeon.
Linda Schulko says this doctor wanted to date Christine, but
Christine was not interested in him. Police, in September, 1968 went to New
York where this doctor moved shortly after the murder. The detectives
questioned him for hours only to leave without making an arrest. A mistake Schulko
felt on the part of the police. In one statement Schulko wrote, “I have been in
written and verbal correspondence” with the suspect and “have no doubt he is a
psychopath.”
In an August, 2011
article published by The Globe and Mail, a college professor sent out students to
conduct their own investigation on cold cases. One group of students were
assigned to the Rothschild murder. These students were able to get into contact
with the doctor who was 84 at this time and living in New York. He denied he
was the killer, but spoke at length with some students about the case. The
murder was “like an act of rage” and the 14 stab wounds were “too many-one good
thrust would do the job if you had the knowledge of anatomy to do it.”
After the interview and a 40-page case analysis, which the
students concluded “was probably not the work of a serial killer,” was turned
over to UW-Madison Police. The lead detective commented “he (the doctor) is
still a person of interest. It’s a fairly short list and he’s on it.”
No arrests have been made and more time passes by without
any further investigaton.
After 47 years, no one has been captured or paid for the
needless murder of an 18 year old college student who had her whole life a head
of her. Christine’s family and best friend mourn her death as much today as
they did in 1968. They all look forward to the day when her killer is brought
to justice.
Read MURDER ON THE 56TH DAY by Linda Schulko for a totally nonfiction, documented story of Christine Rothschild's murder. Linda was her freshman friend and investigated the murder for 51 years. Available on Amazon.
ReplyDeleteHis hiring seems unusual and that he wasn't arrested. Why did they interview Linda at home and not at the campus setting where her life was most of the time?
DeleteNiels Jorgensen disappeared after the murder and worked in Detroit and later journeyed to New York. Madison detectives were unable to arrest him because no evidence was available. He was a person of interest based upon medical coworker and supervisor statements. I was not interviewed on campus but at home because I was in Milwaukee Friday thru Monday of the murder week. Linda Schulko
DeleteCould more than one person have been involved?
DeleteWhy didn't they interview you again on campus right away? Home is a very different environment. You would have remembered more on campus if they had questioned you again there.
DeleteIts almost as if they are not supposed to solve the crime. Very frustrating.
DeleteI'm sure the crime would have been solved if it was possible.
DeleteThe man's handkerchief could of had ether on it? The weapon could have been veterinary medical? The person could have escaped down the tunnels?
ReplyDeleteWeapon could also be dentist surgical or a crafting/woodworking tool handed down if old and kept with DNA still there.
DeleteRapid evap. no evidence. Can't be lead to water or made to drink.
DeleteUsed with Lyssa?
DeleteSomeone working at the UW had expensive tastes in clothing bought in big cities like a handkerchief? The fumes are explosive so it was left at the scene and not taken down a tunnel?
ReplyDeleteWouldn't a chemist know how to prevent flashpoint and where a canister was stored?
DeleteSupplying ether could mean conspiring?
DeleteThe newspaper drawing of the area seems to be incorrect.
DeleteLower temp.
DeleteWo
ReplyDelete"you can fool all of the people some of the time...." A.L.
DeleteDefensive evidence on gloves made the person furious to cover it up?
ReplyDeleteSmother before they inflame?
DeleteWhy didn't the police arrest the doctor while in New York? Because there wasn't anything close to probable cause. Her roomate's description of being weird is not probable cause. You can't just take someone from their home because someone else thinks he did it. However had they leaned on him a more he might have confessed. Who knows?
ReplyDeleteDid the detectives ever really look where the organic cmpd. was kept?
DeleteThe way in which the victim was attacked might seem like evidence of the compound. Where and how the doctor got it could have lead to more evidence?
DeleteWho gave it to him and what/when was the reward?
ReplyDeleteDid the doctor seem coldly efficient,detached?
DeleteStopped a spark so not a reaction?
ReplyDeleteWhat does the author think?
DeleteMemory comes back when the person is placef in the area where crime happened the campus
ReplyDeleteMemory about when the victim started to feel threatened.
Delete